وتووێژی میدیاویکی:Licenses: جیاوازیی نێوان پێداچوونەوەکان

ناوەڕۆکی سڕاو ناوەڕۆکی زیادکراو
No edit summary
ھێڵی ٣:
Im not sure if GFDL is a possible license here. But if it is I have this suggestion: GFDL is meant for software and it is not good for media because it makes it difficult to re-use the material. [[:m:Licensing_update#Motivation|Motivated by the the wish of making it easier to re-use files]] Wikimedia Foundation Board [[:en:Wikipedia:Licensing update|decided in 2009 to stop using GFDL as a sole license]] per [[:wmf:Resolution:Licensing_update_approval|this message]]. So I suggest that GFDL is removed as a suggested license. --[[بەکارھێنەر:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[لێدوانی بەکارھێنەر:MGA73|لێدوان]]) ‏١٧:٤٠، ١٤ی نیسانی ٢٠٢١ (UTC)
:{{وب|MGA73}} Thanks for the message! {{Ping|Kushared}} may be able to help you. ⇐[[بەکارھێنەر:Aram|<span style="font-family:Cursive; color:yellow; Background:Black; font-size:13px;">'''ئارام'''</span>]] <sub>[[لێدوانی بەکارھێنەر:Aram|<span style="color:black; Background:yellow">'''وتووێژ💭'''</span>]]</sub> ‏١٤:٤٦، ١٥ی نیسانی ٢٠٢١ (UTC)
::I updated to same description as English Wiki said (self|cc-by-sa-4.0|GFDL|migration=not-eligible|Own work, multi-license with CC-BY-SA-4.0 and GFDL). Is it good now? [[بەکارھێنەر:Kushared|Kushared]] ([[لێدوانی بەکارھێنەر:Kushared|لێدوان]]) ‏١٧:٠٧، ١٥ی نیسانی ٢٠٢١ (UTC)
{{Ltr/end}}
بگەڕێوە بۆ پەڕەی "Licenses".