وتووێژی میدیاویکی:Licenses

Remove GFDL

Im not sure if GFDL is a possible license here. But if it is I have this suggestion: GFDL is meant for software and it is not good for media because it makes it difficult to re-use the material. Motivated by the the wish of making it easier to re-use files Wikimedia Foundation Board decided in 2009 to stop using GFDL as a sole license per this message. So I suggest that GFDL is removed as a suggested license. --MGA73 (لێدوان) ‏١٧:٤٠، ١٤ی نیسانی ٢٠٢١ (UTC)

@MGA73: Thanks for the message! @Kushared: may be able to help you. ⇐ئارام _{وتووێژ💭} ‏١٤:٤٦، ١٥ی نیسانی ٢٠٢١ (UTC)

I updated to same description as English Wiki said (self|cc-by-sa-4.0|GFDL|migration=not-eligible|Own work, multi-license with CC-BY-SA-4.0 and GFDL). Is it good now? Kushared (لێدوان) ‏١٧:٠٧، ١٥ی نیسانی ٢٠٢١ (UTC)

Hi Kushared! Yes cc-by-sa-4.0 and GFDL together is fine! But I can’t figure out if the code you added will work. Looking at text right-to-left does not work for me. Sorry. But thank you very much for fixing! --MGA73 (لێدوان) ‏٢٠:٢٨، ١٩ی نیسانی ٢٠٢١ (UTC)